Friday, July 12, 2013
The powers delegated to the federal government as specified in the Constitution of the United States of America. And this concerning the militia, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms, are as follows:
Article I: Section. 8.
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
...To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
...Article II. Section. 2.
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
Congress of the United States
begun and held at the City of New-York, on
Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.
THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to PREVENT MISCONSTRUCTION or ABUSE of its powers, that further DECLARATORY and RESTRICTIVE clauses should be added: And as EXTENDING the ground of PUBLIC CONFIDENCE in the Government, will BEST ENSURE the beneficent ends of its institution.
RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, ALL, or any of which Articles, when RATIFIED by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be VALID to ALL INTENTS and PURPOSES, as PART of the said Constitution; viz.
ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution....
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,
the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms, shall NOT be infringed.
Thus it is shown conclusively that congress had/has NO delegated authority over arms in the hands of We The People PERIOD. Furthermore, congress is expressly forbidden from enacting ANY 'law' concerning “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.” For it is expressly declared that this specific right “shall not be infringed”. A FACT which was confirmed by the United States Supreme Court here:
"The second amendment declares that it shall not be infringed, but this, as has been seen, means no more than that it shall not be infringed by Congress. This is one of the amendments that has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the national government, leaving the people to look for their protection against any violation by their fellow citizens of the rights it recognizes, to what is called, in The City of New York v. Miln, 11 Pet. 139, the "powers which relate to merely municipal legislation, or what was, perhaps, more properly called internal police," "not surrendered or restrained" by the Constitution of the United States."--United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875).
Although, it is obvious that the court was erroneous in the above ruling, in that:
RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, ALL, or any of which Articles, when RATIFIED by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be VALID to ALL INTENTS and PURPOSES, as PART of the said Constitution;
For We The People's Constitution also states in:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
Thus it is clear, that congress in fact does have limited delegated authority over arms in the hands of the militia. Equally clear, is the FACT that congress has NO delegated authority over arms in the hands of We The People. Rather, congress has been expressly prohibited from enacting ANY 'law' which contravenes the right of the people to keep and bear arms. For the right to arms is “a resource which Freemen [and women] will never part with” [Journals of the Continental Congress, Dec. 6, 1775.]
Now, how do those which “shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation” to “support this Constitution”. Get away with blatantly violating it at every opportunity? Simple, because they have entered into a conspiracy to do so. And all of the distinct branches within our governments; municipal, state and federal, (with very few exceptions). Have combined in the very long running fraudulent scheme to deprive We The People of our Liberties and Rights. And this long running tyrannical usurpation must end.
To anyone that would contend that which is contended above is not the actual facts of the case. I'll use the “pat” legal answer; “ignorance of the [Supreme] law is no excuse”.