Saturday, August 10, 2013

And during the period when the most grievous acts of tyranny were enacted...

   The words "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" are impossible to misconstrue. Yet they have been for quite a number of decades. The various writings of the people instrumental in framing our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Prove beyond all shadow of doubt what they intended by Constitutionally securing that right for We The People. That the perversion of our right was intentionally perpetrated would be difficult to prove. However, if it wasn't done intentionally, then it just proves that we have some incredibly ignorant hired servants.

   Our first President warned We The People numerous times concerning the propensity of governments to becoming corrupt. And almost all of the Presidents immediately following him, for quite a few years. Echoed his sentiments using his words, or words of their own. Adams, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, John Quincy Adams, and Jackson all warned us of the impending danger.Yet the established system of "checks and balances" soon proved to be ineffectual guards indeed.

   After three years of intensive study, a number of contributing factors in the destruction of our rights have become glaringly self-evident. The historical materials gathered in this study were from sources such as, mainly; The Library of Congress. As well as the universities of Chicago, Virginia, and Yale. In addition to newspaper articles dated from the founding era all the way up into the early 20th century. All of which are dated and properly referenced and appear throughout this website.
   The people most responsible for the infringement of our Constitutionally secured right are of course We The People ourselves. For we allowed our hired servants to enact these tyrannical laws to begin with. And, when not enough resistance was offered against these usurpations. It only prompted the tyrants to continue on in their unconstitutional actions. Which were supposedly done for 'our own good'. Of course the main blame lies with the treasonous politicians that ultimately passed all of the laws to begin with. As well as the equally treasonous judicial entities that have upheld the tyrannical usurpations. These treasonous usurpers naturally would all claim that their only concern was the 'general welfare'. While not letting us know of course, that it was their 'welfare' that they were primarily concerned about. Then, within the last one hundred years or so. And during the period when the most grievous acts of tyranny were enacted. We can directly blame the American Bar Association, various Police entities across the country, and the newspaper reporters that whined until the usurpations were carried out. Many of these same entities, along with some new traitors, are still actively working to undermine our right currently.

   One of the erroneous claims that has been made by the courts. Would be that there is long standing 'precedent' established for all of these 'reasonable regulations'. Just as was claimed in the Heller case by the Supreme Court. While of course failing to admit, or perhaps even realize. That the precedents they held up were BEFORE the establishment of the United States Constitution. Which of course was established, in part, to correct the dissatisfaction of many of the people with the British laws. Instead, the Court permitted the continuance of the British 'common law'. Even utilizing it itself in many of their decisions up into the mid 1800's. And which many of the lower courts also quoted from in their decisions as well. Early on in our Republic there was perhaps understandable reasoning for this. In that all of these courts had nothing to go by. Other than the English law books which were employed at that time. That is not a justifiable excuse however, but merely indicates laziness on the part of our hired
servants in the courts. The fact that Judge St. George Tucker had adapted Blackstones Commentaries to the intended American legal system in 1803. Leaves all of our courts without any justification whatsoever. It only proves that they intentionally disregarded American law in favor of old English precedent. Which of course is despicable, if not outright treasonous. There have been Justices, including within the United States Supreme Court itself. That have in their opinions, many of which are indissent. Declared similarly as to that which is contended above. A prime example of which would be Justice Hugo Lafayette Black's dissenting opinion in Adamson v. People Of State Of California, June 23, 1947. In which both Justice Douglas and Swayne joined in dissent.
   One of the main purposes of the United States Constitution was to establish AMERICAN law. And NOT to emulate the British laws which of course had played a role in causing them to revolt in the first place. Thus, the true intent was that the U.S. Constitution was INTENDED to be the basis upon which ALL other laws in ALL parts of the country were to stand upon. And this FACT is proven beyond all shadow of doubt in the wording of the Constitution itself. To Wit:
Article. IV. Section. 1.
Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.
Section. 2.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States....
...Article. V.
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate....
...Article. VI....
...This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
   The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States....
   There can be no denying the plain intent of the wording used by the framers of our Constitution. For it is plainly spelled out, if not almost word by word. But most definitely clause by clause, in the Federalist Papers. Which were the very means employed to "sell" We The People on the idea of the new Constitution. Being a total explanation of the terms of the compact, or contract if you will. Describing in detail the terms of the governmental system we were entering into. Nor can it be denied that ALL branches of our federal government. As well as the very large majority of the various state governments. Have totally been operating outside the bounds of We The People's Constitution. And this, from not to long of a period of time after the Constitution had been ratified. We The People have been and are continuing to be scammed by inept and corrupted public servants, Servants that are still perversely attempting to utilize 'English', (and other), 'precedents' in our legal system. This PERVERSITY must CEASE and DESIST immediately. We The People need to DEMAND that our governments govern themselves WITHIN the bounds of our Constitution. According to the terms that were specified. And INSIST that ALL current 'laws' that are plainly repugnant to our Constitution are struck down as NULL and VOID. It is not only our right, but our duty to REQUIRE that our servants serve us as they were Constitutionally charged to do.

No comments: