Sunday, August 11, 2013

"to interfere with a right that once was inalienable in order to enable individuals to protect themselves from the tyranny"

[Anadarko Daily Democrat, Anadarko, Oklahoma, Monday, Dec. 12, 1910. Volume IX. No. 262 Pg. 2]
   Yeah, that worked out REAL WELL for all of those Chinese that were SLAUGHTERED by their own government, DIDN'T IT?

   And how does a right go from "inalienable" to being alienable? Easy, it does NOT. For "inalienable" means that it CANNOT be alienated. This author must have been smoking opium. Oh, wait a minute. Yeah, I almost forgot, this was posted in a "Democrat" paper. Never mind....

No comments: