The powers delegated to the federal
government as specified in the Constitution of the United States of
America. And this concerning the militia, and the right of the
people to keep and bear arms, are as follows:
Article I: Section. 8.
The Congress shall have Power To lay
and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and
provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the
United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform
throughout the United States;
...To provide for calling forth the
Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and
repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming,
and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them
as may be employed in the Service of the United States,
reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the
Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the
discipline prescribed by Congress;
...Article II. Section. 2.
The President shall be Commander in
Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia
of the several States, when called into the actual Service of
the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of
the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any
Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he
shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against
the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
Congress of the United States
begun and held at the City of New-York,
on
Wednesday the fourth of March, one
thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.
THE Conventions of a number of the
States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution,
expressed a desire, in order to PREVENT MISCONSTRUCTION or
ABUSE of its powers, that further DECLARATORY
and RESTRICTIVE clauses should be added: And as
EXTENDING the ground of PUBLIC CONFIDENCE in the Government, will
BEST ENSURE the beneficent ends of its institution.
RESOLVED by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress
assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following
Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as
amendments to the Constitution of the United States, ALL, or any of
which Articles, when RATIFIED by three fourths of the said
Legislatures, to be VALID to ALL INTENTS and PURPOSES, as PART
of the said Constitution; viz.
ARTICLES in addition to, and
Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America,
proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several
States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original
Constitution....
...Amendment II
DECLARATORY clause;
A well regulated militia, being
necessary to the security of a free state,
RESTRICTIVE clause;
the Right of the People to Keep and
Bear Arms, shall NOT be infringed.
Thus it is shown conclusively that
congress had/has NO delegated authority over arms in the hands
of We The People PERIOD. Furthermore, congress is expressly
forbidden from enacting ANY 'law' concerning “the right
of the people to keep and bear arms.” For it is expressly
declared that this specific right “shall not
be infringed”. A FACT which was confirmed by the United States
Supreme Court here:
"The second
amendment declares that it shall not be infringed, but this, as has
been seen, means no more than that it shall not be infringed by
Congress. This is one of the amendments that has no other effect
than to restrict the powers of the national government,
leaving the people to look for their protection against any violation
by their fellow citizens of the rights it recognizes, to what is
called, in The City of New York v. Miln, 11 Pet. 139, the "powers
which relate to merely municipal legislation, or what was, perhaps,
more properly called internal police," "not surrendered or
restrained" by the Constitution of the United
States."--United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875).
Although, it is obvious that the court was
erroneous in the above ruling, in that:
RESOLVED by the
Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America,
in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the
following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several
States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, ALL,
or any of which Articles, when RATIFIED by three fourths of the said
Legislatures, to be VALID to ALL INTENTS and PURPOSES, as PART
of the said Constitution;
For
We The People's Constitution also states in:
Article
IV;
This
Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made
in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made,
under the Authority of the United States, shall
be the supreme Law of the Land;
and the Judges in every
State shall be bound thereby,
any Thing in the
Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
The
Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members
of the several State Legislatures,
and all executive
and judicial Officers,
both
of the United States and
of the several States, shall
be bound by Oath or Affirmation,
to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be
required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the
United States.
Thus
it is clear, that congress in fact does have limited
delegated authority over arms in the hands of the militia.
Equally clear, is the FACT that congress has NO delegated authority
over arms in the hands of We The People. Rather, congress has been
expressly prohibited from enacting ANY 'law' which contravenes the
right of the people to keep and bear arms. For the right to arms is
“a resource which Freemen
[and women] will never
part with” [Journals of the
Continental Congress, Dec. 6, 1775.]
Now,
how do those which “shall be bound by Oath or
Affirmation” to
“support this Constitution”.
Get away with blatantly violating it at every opportunity? Simple,
because they have entered into a conspiracy
to do so. And all of the
distinct branches within our governments; municipal,
state and federal,
(with very few exceptions). Have combined in the very long running
fraudulent scheme to deprive We The People of our Liberties and
Rights. And this long running
tyrannical usurpation must end.
To
anyone that would contend that which is contended above is not the
actual facts of the case.
I'll use the “pat” legal answer; “ignorance of the
[Supreme] law is no excuse”.
No comments:
Post a Comment