"The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms shall NOT be infringed." _________________________________________________________________________ "The God who gave us life gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them." --Thomas Jefferson _________________________________________________________________________ Shredding the lies one slice at a time....
Tuesday, January 31, 2006
Well, I guess that makes our Representatives Infidels then...
Monday, January 30, 2006
God, I sure as hell hope not....
Sunday, January 29, 2006
Saturday, January 28, 2006
Can't quite figure this one out....
Further info touching this topic can be found at The War on Guns and Blognomicon
.
The Information Office of China's State Council issued on October 19 a white paper on China's political democracy, vowing to actively push forward the reforms of its political system although, it said, tremendous achievements had been scored in this regard.
The white paper, issued by the Information Office of China's State Council, or the cabinet, is the first of its kind in China, giving a detailed account of the inception, development and contents of the socialist political democracy and the principles the country will abide by.
The document, titled Building of Political Democracy in China, also points out the problems the country has to overcome and major steps to be taken in the reforms of its political system.
The socialist political democracy "is the apt choice suited to China's conditions and meeting the requirement of social progress," said the white paper. (this is the first I've heard of paper talking).
Such democracy has enabled the Chinese people, who account for one fifth of the world's population, "to become masters of their own country and society, and enjoy extensive democratic rights," the white paper says.
In building socialist political democracy, China has always adhered to the basic principle that the Marxist theory of democracy be combined with the reality of China, it says.
In the process, China has also borrowed from the useful achievements of the political civilization of mankind, including Western democracy, and assimilated the democratic elements of from China's traditional culture and institutional civilization.
"Therefore, China's socialist political democracy shows distinctive Chinese characteristics," says the white paper.
Such characteristics are as follows:
-- China's democracy is a people's democracy under the leadership of the Communist Party of China (CPC).
-- China's democracy is a democracy in which the overwhelming majority of the people act as masters of State affairs.
-- China's democracy is a democracy guaranteed by the people's democratic dictatorship.
-- China's democracy is a democracy with democratic centralism as the basic organizational principle and mode of operation.
.
Okay, then! Am I the only one to see a distinct problem here? I know that WALMART and GOOGLE have swallowed this. But, personally, I'm having a little problem understanding this position.
.
This makes our Constitutional misinterpretations look like a cakewalk! And given that statement about borrowing from Western Democracy, it is starting to become more clear which direction our politicians are leading us!
Let's continue, shall we? Can someone tell me what a Marxist Socialist Political Democracy, under the leadership of the communist party and guaranteed by a democratic DICTATORSHIP is?
.
There's something really, really wrong going on here! Don't have the ammunition to blast it, yet. But, I think we need to keep our eyes WIDE OPEN! Blognomicon hasn't been black-balled, yet. (Try posting in Chinese and see how fast you get nailed). But GunShowOnTheNet did two, three months back. You see, I put on the blog "To HELL with Tyrants!" in a number of different languages. Including two different Chinese dialects. They lasted approximately 12 hours - then 'poof' gone! Or rather scrambled beyond recognition, I should say. (Funny thing about that, as this was well before Sergey's announcement, and doesn't Google own Blogger?)
.
Isn't there something wrong in supporting a government that is repressive of the Rights of its people? Yet, every single time we buy something made in China. We aid in the continued oppression of its people. Wonder what the Founders would think about that? Or, does anybody even care what the men, who brought us freedom, would think?
.
Anyone who values TRUE FREEDOM, would surely want to deeply consider the merit of buying products from a DICTATORSHIP. By any other name it can be called, it's still TYRANNY!
.
And, here is an add-on; My coffee pot went out earlier. The only store open at midnight is, of course, WalMart! So, despite my distaste, (hypocrisy - ON), I caved and went there. I AM A COFFEEHOLIC, I MUST HAVE MY COFFEE. To curb my guilt, I thought to myself, I'll get a U.S. made coffee-maker. WRONG! Every last coffee-maker known to mankind is made in China!
.
This causes another train of thought. Just what DO we make in the U.S.? Anything? What in the HELL is happening to US? Never mind, think I answered my own question.
.
ONE more thing! Decided to look into the LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS of my Hypocritical Act. And, much to my dismay, I discovered that I'm guilty of Aiding and Abetting;
aid
intr. & tr.v. aid·ed, aid·ing, aids
1. The act or result of helping; assistance.
4. A monetary payment to a feudal lord by a vassal in medieval England.
a·bet
tr.v. a·bet·ted, a·bet·ting, a·bets
1. To approve, encourage, and support (an action or a plan of action); urge and help on.
2. To urge, encourage, or help (a person): abetted the thief in robbing the bank.
.
Guilt and Coffee, yeah, I'll have NO PROBLEM sleeping tonight!
Taking Up Arms....
Friday, January 27, 2006
So, we can MAKE them, but we can't possess them?
.
- Thomas Jefferson, to Edmond Charles Genet, November 30, 1793
.
In one of these memorials, it is stated, that arms and military accoutrements are now buying up by a French agent in this Country with an intent to export them to France. We have answered that our Citizens have been always free to make, vend and export arms, that it is the constant occupation and livelihood of some of them. To suppress their callings, the only means, perhaps, of their subsistence, because a war exists in foreign and distant countries, in which we have no concern, would scarcely be expected. It would be hard in principle and impossible in practice. The law of nations, therefore, respecting the rights of those at peace, has not required from them such an internal derangement in their occupations. It is satisfied with the external penalty pronounced in the President's proclamation, that of confiscation of such portion of these arms as shall fall into the hands of any of the belligerent powers, on their way to the ports of their enemies. To this penalty our citizens are warned that they will be abandoned; and that the purchase of arms here, may work no inequality between the parties at war, the liberty to make them will be enjoyed equally by both.
.
- Thomas Jefferson, to Jean Baptiste Ternant, May 15, 1793
.
Thursday, January 26, 2006
This is just so, unbelievably, wrong....
Dear Susan,Your article, which closed with the following, at the next to last sentence;...and concentrating on ways to truly improve public safety....
Caused me to write the following rebuttal;
Funny you should mention that, Susan! Especially after all the drool you slobbered, before the final 'nugget', near the end of your drivel.
It is that 'nugget' which I will expound upon, Susan. Now, be a good little troll and get back up into your high-chair.
You see, Susan. The 'ways to truly improve public safety', have ALREADY been laid out. Many, many years ago. This of course, was previous to the time in which creatures like yourself were spawned.
The Framers of our Constitution, who had neglected to put obvious inference to the people's RKBA. Did so, because they couldn't perceive that there would arise urchins of hell, yes - much like you Susan. Urchins, that could possibly think that the RKBA, was not a NATURAL one.
There were those, however, that caught this oversight, and insisted there be mention of this right. Hence, the entrance of the Bill of Rights, Susan! So that little despicable, whining, irresponsible creatures, such as yourself. Couldn't whine, kick, piss and moan til they got their way.
Now, wipe up the drool, be a good little troll and go back to your sandbox!
Are you even aware of the INTENTIONS of our Constitution or Bill of Rights, Susan? As well as the reasoning and IMPORTANCE of them?
Your contention is to let those in government 'protect' us? Fine job they did on 9/11, eh? And, how about the robust job they are doing along the border with Mexico? Over 216 armed incursions onto Sovereign U.S. soil by FOREIGN Military troops? And, you would have us be at the total mercy of grossly negligent, corrupt and greedy politicians?
You need to do some study on American history, Susan! We are supposed to be a Free Republic, governed by a Constitution! And, as pointed out by Mr. Alexander Hamilton, in Federalist #28;
You seem to lack the comprehension as to why our Founders wanted ALL Citizens ARMED. It was to discourage any thought by government of attempt to establish a TYRANNY! It is a VITAL SAFEGUARD, erected to ensure against corruption in government! It was so the People could repel ANY attackers, whether they be Foreign or Domestic!
Editor; if you value the monetary gain derived from your readers, it may be wise to reexamine what is placed in your paper! The press was SUPPOSED to be one of the Safeguards set in place by the Founders. The function of it, was to warn all citizens of potential harm that may arise from government!
If this paper has any moral clarity, at all. It will perform a reevaluation of its intentions and motives! And, instead of acting as a tool of the 'elite'. Will return to the knowledge of providing a venue for truth to its readers! Lies, like paper sacks, only hold water for so long!
With Utter Contempt,
E. David Quammen
Wednesday, January 25, 2006
And, a word of WARNING from THE MAN, to the USURPERS;
(You blind leaders of the blind! Do you think that you shall escape HIS WRATH?)
Monday, January 23, 2006
Erecting a Police State in America - A Very Bad Plan
As originally printed on
American Chronicle
By Nancy Levant
January 23, 2006
.
As a response to 911, our elected representatives have given to the American people, via many statutes, The Department of Homeland Security - a civilian agency. They have also broadened the national powers and militarized FEMA.
.
Equally, C.O.P.S. (Community Oriented Policing Services) has been massively and federally funded to set up private policing patrols in most, if not all, of the new deed-restricted and “planned” communities where many American citizens now live. These policed communities are being raised in every state in the nation – rapidly.
.
City and county law enforcement are now required to cross-train with military, and those lines have now blurred. All across our nation, para-military forces, including foreign troops at our Southern border, are performing practice drills – over and over and over again.
.
A full-blown Martial Law system, which includes the “suspension” of the Constitution of the United States, has been set into stone by presidential Executive Orders. Most of these orders were declared prior to 911, but for the sake of this article, we will overlook that fact for now.
Without question, our elected representatives have rapidly erected plans for a police state in our nation. Now, let’s assume that their decisions to raise a paramilitary police state in the United States of America are merely a response to 911. For now, we will also overlook the thousands upon thousands of treaties, charters, compacts, and “partnership” bureaucracies that were signed and implemented behind our backs – the ones with direct links to the United Nations, the World Bank, the World Trade Organization, and the Organization of American States, for example. However, we will put all of this aside for now.
.
But let’s get to the issue of homeland security, as in securing our form of government and the freedoms guaranteed to the people of the 50 United States. Post 911, our elected representatives raised a new homeland security system, which includes full-blown and documented plans for 1) the suspension of our Constitution, 2) military rule of the nation, and 3) a national populace stripped of their civil rights – all of them.
With this in mind, I suggest to you the following:
.
Our elected have no authority whatsoever, explicit or implicit, to plan for the suspension of our Constitutional form of government, as they are sworn by oath, and by the income we pay them, to its upholding and defense.
.
Martial Law in the United States of America will result in unthinkable and unintended consequences.
.
That organizing a paramilitary system, with powers to suspend Constitutional authority and government is, at best, detrimental to the nation, its people, and a very shortsighted and dangerous plan.
.
Should a police state ensue, it will result in permanent and sweeping societal and governmental changes. All nations that lost their governmental structures, and citizens who lost all civil rights due to military take-over, never woke up one sunny, magical morning and found their governments and rights restored. If in doubt, I refer you to South and Central America for the results of paramilitary take-over.
.
No American citizen, including some in office, wants Martial Law, a police state, and military dictatorship EVEN IF there IS another 911, or worse. In fact, that would be the worst thing that could possibly happen. Stay with me and I will tell you why.
.
Our elected representatives have not exercised clear, Constitutional authority by planning for, much less erecting, a full-blown police state, and with the full intention of suspending our nation’s government.
.
Is there a homeland security problem? Yes, indeed, there is. Have our representatives devised an emergency response system that has enormous potential for unthinkable consequences? Yes, they certainly have. On this point, I am in total agreement with the ACLU.
.
So, the question begs – why would our elected representatives make unconstitutional decisions to raise a new national security system that is fraught with danger BEFORE using their Constitutional authority, which not only permits them to LEGALLY defend against violations of law, insurrections, and/or invasions, but is clearly defined within the Constitution, as well? When our Constitution contains an amendment, as well as Article I, Section 8, Clauses 15 and 16, which were written SPECIFICALLY to address homeland security due to violations of law, insurrections, and/or invasions, and specific instructions on how to defend and protect all of the states in the nation, why did our representatives completely ignore this amendment and instead step wholly out of their legal authority to devise a police/military dictatorship? Excuse me, but planning to destroy our Constitution and our national independence is a criminal act. No one inside of government or otherwise has the legal authority to devise such a plan.
.
When our elected representatives are employing inappropriate and dangerous means, of any kind, that could result in a police state, which they devised, they are acting outside of any legal authority AND they are not following their LEGAL book of instructions for securing the homeland. Usurping the governmental structure of this nation by erecting a police state is not only fundamentally destructive; it is also a criminal act in this nation. Law is law.
.
So, to our representatives, I say this: Instead of illegally shredding the Constitution, how about using the document you swore to uphold to secure this nation – if that is, indeed, your intent. Planning and erecting a dictatorship in the United States, using synthetic and “what if” scenarios and hysteria to do so, is beyond stupid. Equally, you are affirmatively destroying the structure that employs you. Your shortsightedness is, frankly, astounding! Equally astounding is your refusal to look to the Constitution for answers, assuming you are looking for answers.
.
Now, to my readers, as WE are law-abiding people, we, too, must look to our Constitution for homeland security. But first, let’s look at some historical parallels to our current condition, which serve to clarify our current and terribly vulnerable condition, thanks to our elected and their gun controlling means and methods.
.
Consider the French and Indian Wars. During those times, many “enemies” of the settlers were unknown entities and potentially anywhere and everywhere. Colonists had to deal with the international war between the French and English, which drew them into a rather irregular war, and they also had to deal with Tory and Indian bands, which were more akin to today’s terrorism-style conflicts. Those wars were a mix of undeclared conflicts and a declared war, but more akin to “terrorism” threats. People had to be prepared for just about anything, at any time, and attack by multiple means and numbers. Then consider the Revolutionary War, which immediately followed, a declared and international war. The founding fathers of the United States were very familiar with both the French and Indian conflicts AND declared and international warfare. These men had experienced and seen it all. And this is specifically why they worded the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution as follows:
.
"A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
.
Now, the founding fathers of this nation, having had experience with undeclared and declared conflicts and wars, specifically placed homeland security powers and authority into the hands of the each of the states’ militias, which were not only necessary to the security of each state, but were also MANDATORY. Via the Colonial and State Militia Acts of that time, every male between the ages of 16 and 60 were REQUIRED to be in service to the defense of their states and, if necessary, their nation.
.
The right of the people to keep and bear arms was absolutely understood by the founding fathers as necessary to the “security” of “free” states. Therefore, a “free state” is one in which the population of that state is always armed IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN that state’s security. This is not rocket science. Reinstate the Constitutional definition of “militias,” which were organizations specifically created to protect the homeland using a fully armed population, and you have homeland security. But how, you ask?
.
As with most historical perversions, the word “militia” now denotes something entirely different to the minds of American people. We now believe militias to be radical, fringe-type groups. However, from a Constitutional point of fact and law, the “Militia of several States” meant every male person, age 16 to 60, was required by law to 1) have adversary-worthy weapons in his home, maintained in proper working order and subject to inspection, and 2) a proper store of ammunition, and other accoutrements that were necessary to defend his city, state and/or nation.
.
Let me make this as plain as I can – The 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America states that a well-regulated Militia is NECESSARY to the SECURITY of a free state, and therefore the defined Militia is to be 1) a fully armed population, 2) with arms and ammunitions in ALL homes, and 3) is NOT an option but a LEGAL DUTY of ALL male citizens. The right to keep and bear arms is, therefore, 1) an absolute, and 2) applies to all free male citizens, according to our 2nd Amendment (there are/were exceptions – most do not apply today being related to the legal ownership of slaves).
.
According to our purposefully ignored 2nd Amendment, which has also been politically perverted into a keep and bear-only mentality, the actual meaning of the 2nd Amendment IS homeland security. Consider the following: Imagine if America, today, had an entirely armed population, as did our Colonial ancestors in every state. Every man on every street is armed with standard, military issue weapons. Now, let us then consider how we would feel about our natural right of resistance and self-preservation to restrain the violence of ANY type of oppression, insurrection, or invasion.
.
The 2nd Amendment not only provides our elected representatives with a homeland security book of instructions, it also explains, explicitly, that in order to have freedom AND security simultaneously, a well-regulated Militia is “NECESSARY.” For any insurrections, you call up the Militia, which is every man, in any state, or in any neighborhood, on-call, every day of every year, and armed.
.
And again I say to the careerists in office, the Constitution solves the problem of securing the homeland. Not one of you can question the fact that a Militia is necessary to the security of a free state. The need for the reinstatement of the Militia of the several states is not an obscure fantasy. It is a conclusion of fact and law that the Constitution has adopted, and therefore applies to every public official. No public official can deny this conclusion, because every public official has taken an “oath or affirmation to support this constitution.”
.
In conclusion, I ask all gun-owning readers to please forward this article to your gun clubs and associations. I would like to see the NRA, the GOA, the NFA, the AFA, and all other gun associations take the lead and initiative to revisit what actually may have been the founding intent of their organizations. We need to lobby all state legislatures to introduce bills to reinstate the states’ militias according to the 2nd Amendment and the current state of American affairs. We the People have the legal right to raise the Constitutional Militia in each and every one of our states, and the proper way to do so is legislatively. The language of the Constitution will not be undermined. Nor is it up for reinterpretation by anyone. Legality is on our side.
.
We also know that ANY gun control, whatsoever, goes directly contrary to our 2nd Amendment rights SPECIFICALLY due to the fact that homeland security IS a dire fact of today’s world, and SPECIFICALLY due to the raising of a police state, which WILL disarm the public in order to succeed. You’ve heard the term “Gun-Free Zones?” How about Defense-Free Zones, or for that matter, how about a totally disarmed nation other than those in the police state? Have you ever heard the legal term “badge of slavery?” Disarmament is the first badge of slavery.
.
Also, what is the point of winning the battle against “terrorism” overseas if we lose the battle at home? Considering the absence of American troops from American soil for the last 100 years, what other option to homeland security is viable? Equally, and as history relays in one police state after another, usurpers and tyrants initiate criminal activities via secret-police-style apparatuses, spying, intelligence and investigatory agencies. Resistance networks tend to get “broken up” prior to armed force and public displays of the actual police state itself.
.
I would rather see America LEGALLY defended by her citizens than by a foreign/domestic-hybrid paramilitary force created by careerists and bureaucrats, who have unconstitutionally and illegally erected police state infrastructures all across the United States of America – and to what purpose and end only the globalists know, for now.
.
It’s time to take back our government and our Constitutional right and DUTY to defend our Constitution and constitutionally guaranteed freedoms. We have every legal right to do so, and our 2nd Amendment mandates that Militias of the several States (meaning every one of our states) be raised to secure this nation. Assuming the boys on the Hill will not be so inclined, we must demand that all of our states comply with the mandates of the 2nd Amendment. They cannot legally refuse to do so as they are subordinate to the Constitution and its 2nd Amendment.
.
For help in reinstating the Constitutional Militia via your state legislatures, contact Dr. Edwin Vieira via NewsWithViews.com. The answer to our vulnerability and our security is very simple and very absolute. Tyrants, usurpers with armies, and foreign terrorists are no match for a nationally armed population. The answer is so simple and clear. America must remain free and sovereign America. Therefore, you arm the full citizenry to secure freedom, as instructed by the 2nd Amendment. This IS homeland security.
.
We live in an environment inundated by ignorance and disinformation. Therefore, it is understandable why we have lacked for so long any social solidarity or sense of mutual reliance upon each other as American people. We have been purposefully, covertly, divided into paranoid separatist groups via the liberal/conservative, young/old, religion and pigmentation divide mechanisms. I suggest that being a part of your state’s militia will help you to remember that you are an American, with rights and freedom first and foremost, and that your neighbors – all of them – have and are the same.
.
We need to be united once more as a nationality that is based upon free people and THEIR government. We have to be united, because 1) a police state cannot possibly exist under the Constitution, but is being planned nonetheless, and 2) by defining “homeland security” as a centralized bureaucratic apparatus that interlinks intelligence agencies, police departments and programs, community special forces, FEMA, technological surveillance and databases, and the Armed Forces, Congress has evaded its DUTY “to call forth the Militia, as mandated by Article I, Section 8, Clauses 15 and 16 of the Constitution, to execute the LAWS of the Union, to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.” Instead they have invented and erected an anti-constitutional infrastructure for Martial Law, military take-over, and a police state. This was a remarkably stupid thing to do.
.
For all of you who have asked ten thousand times what you can do – this is it. I suggest you begin with your gun associations and Dr. Edwin Vieira via NewsWithViews.com. We have to get bills introduced into the state legislatures to reinstate the Militias of the several States.
In understanding your Constitutional rights and obligations, the true power (and duty) to understand the Constitutional Militia lies in Article I, Section 8, Clauses 15 and 16. The 2nd Amendment emphasizes the importance of these clauses because its statement that "a well regulated Militia [is] necessary to the security of a free State" ties down the interrelationship so well, and binds all public officials to accept, follow, and implement it – no questions asked. But, as a matter of law, the Militia do not depend on the 2nd Amendment. Even if there were no 2nd Amendment, the powers/duties of the Militia would be the same. We’re getting smarter every day! Now let’s get the job done! We need the help and power of our gun associations, and we need them now. Start emailing, calling, and forwarding. Also refer them to Dr. Edwin Vieira for guidance.
Martin had a Dream, Thomas had a Confidence. Neither have fully come true.
Friday, January 20, 2006
The first weapon banners......
Now there was no smith found throughout all the land of Israel: for the Philistines said, Lest the Hebrews make [them] swords or spears:
1Sa 13:20
But all the Israelites went down to the Philistines, to sharpen every man his share, and his coulter, and his axe, and his mattock.
1Sa 13:21
Yet they had a file for the mattocks, and for the coulters, and for the forks, and for the axes, and to sharpen the goads.
1Sa 13:22
So it came to pass in the day of battle, that there was neither sword nor spear found in the hand of any of the people that [were] with Saul and Jonathan: but with Saul and with Jonathan his son was there found.
1Sa 13:23
And the garrison of the Philistines went out to the passage of Michmash.
Thursday, January 19, 2006
Open letter of response to Jim and Sarah Brady
(Excerpt as found on Keep and Bear Arms)
"His constituents may not have noticed, but readers of Gun Week, a specialty trade rag catering to firearm enthusiasts, know all about Sen. John Giannetti's role in killing legislation to ban assault weapons in Maryland."
.
..."And because of Giannetti, semiautomatic assault weapons remain freely available in Maryland, even as gun violence escalates in Prince George's, Baltimore, and in the state's other cities."
.
'We've decided to make it clear, and to make it clear early, that we think the voters of District 21 should send this guy home,' said Jim Brady, chair of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. 'He was elected to represent the people of Prince George's and Anne Arundel, but he spends most of time sucking up to special interests. He's just an awful, awful elected official.'"
.
And following is my Open Response to Jim and Sarah Brady, as well as their minion Peter Hamm;
.
Even more awful is attempts at treason and subversion, Jim. Your short-sighted vengence has made you a despicable creature. There are people that have life a whole lot worse than you can ever imagine. Like little children starving to death in their mothers arms. That is a 'worthy' cause to champion, Jim. Yet, I see no outcry from you on that score.
.
Your whining and justification for impelling the usurpation of our God-Given and Constitutionally protected Rights is shameful. Your judgment is plainly clouded by resentment. You advocate leaving innocent people wide-open to becoming victims of inherent evil. Your morals and scruples have been compromised. And now Jim, YOU are even worse of an inherent evil than the man that shot you.
.
I did not hear Ronald Reagan whimper and moan after he was shot, Jim. He took it like a man, and he was much older than you! No, you are actively trying to undermine the whole Foundation of OUR Country! The main reason for the Founders ensuring the RIGHT of THE PEOPLE to Keep and Bear Arms, was to REPEL ALL ENEMIES FOREIGN or DOMESTIC! By your cowardly whimpering, you have directly contributed to a great many deaths already! Yet you remain, selfishly, unsatisfied! You, Peter and Sarah are ALL TRAITORS to your fellowman and Country!
.
You have perversely and unceasingly attacked the RIGHTS of your fellow citizens. Not caring, in the slightest, for the number of people that have died because they were unable to defend themselves! You are GUILTY of TREASON, Jim! And are an accomplice to MURDER! You are deemed worthy of an ETERNITY in that chair! Do you think that you shall escape the Judgement of God for your perversion? That you were so weak that you could not bear the burden that was handed to you? That you caused the robbery of your fellowman of the ability to defend him/herself and their families?
.
You, and simular spawn of hell as you, are cowards and irresponsible, lazy infants! For you demand that OTHERS put their lives on the line for your defense! You are a very sorry example of manhood! There are people that have a valid excuse to rely on the protection offered by others! For they are UNABLE, for many different reasons, of being able to protect themselves! And, that is one of the responsibilities of an armed citizen - to PROTECT their neighbor and offer a defense for those who cannot defend themselves!
.
You and your ILK are treacherously evil examples of the worst type of human beings! There is merit in your earthly sufferings!
Finally, someone who knows the Truth....
Wednesday, January 18, 2006
Okay, you DC MORONS....
American Patrol Report - Up to date news on Foreign incursions onto U.S. Sovereign soil. According to a DHS document in a article by Daily Bulletin, there have been, (known, at least), 216 incursions into the United States by Mexican soldiers since 1996!
.
Tuesday, January 17, 2006
Man, George is REALLY pissed....
(Well, you see George, many of us would be happy to excersize our personal services to the defense. But, alas, our current government is taking the tools used for defense out of the hands of the people. No, George, you see they think themselves superior, to you and the other founders, and that they are the only ones who should have control of the tools for defense. Yes, I know that is NOT what you had intended. But, sadly, that is what they are doing!)
Is it just me? (And a few MILLION others)....
Monday, January 16, 2006
I knew there was something not quite right......
- Thomas Jefferson
Sunday, January 15, 2006
Now this GROUP has a GOOD IDEA....
We announced that we were going to develop the We The People Congress to become “the nationwide force that will institutionalize and organize citizen vigilance.”
Thousands of people joined the Congress as Members. Hundreds signed on as voluntary County and State coordinators.